Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177776›Full record

ArticleJournal of evolutionary biology2022

Measuring, comparing and interpreting phenotypic selection on floral scent.

Øystein H Opedal, Karin Gross, Elodie Chapurlat, Amy Parachnowitsch, Nina Joffard, Nina Sletvold, Otso Ovaskainen, Magne Friberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evolutionary biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Øystein H OpedalBiodiversity Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-6933
Karin GrossDepartment of Environment & Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Elodie ChapurlatPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, EBC, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Amy ParachnowitschDepartment of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Nina JoffardUniversity of Lille, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, Lille, France.
Nina SletvoldPlant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, EBC, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-3449
Otso OvaskainenDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Magne FribergBiodiversity Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Academy of Finland 284601Academy of Finland 309581Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning 20:323Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics and MF from the Swedish Research Council and the Crafoord FoundationJane and Aatos Erkko Foundation and the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence Funding Scheme 223257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural selection on floral scent composition is a key element of the hypothesis that pollinators and other floral visitors drive scent evolution. The measure of such selection is complicated by the high-dimensional nature of floral scent data and uncertainty about the cognitive processes involved in scent-mediated communication. We use dimension reduction through reduced-rank regression to jointly estimate a scent composite trait under selection and the strength of selection acting on this trait. To assess and compare variation in selection on scent across species, time and space, we reanalyse 22 datasets on six species from four previous studies. The results agreed qualitatively with previous analyses in terms of identifying populations and scent compounds subject to stronger selection but also allowed us to evaluate and compare the strength of selection on scent across studies. Doing so revealed that selection on floral scent was highly variable, and overall about as common and as strong as selection on other phenotypic traits involved in pollinator attraction or pollen transfer. These results are consistent with an important role of floral scent in pollinator attraction. Our approach should be useful for further studies of plant-animal communication and for studies of selection on other high-dimensional phenotypes. In particular, our approach will be useful for studies of pollinator-mediated selection on complex scent blends comprising many volatiles, and when no prior information on the physiological responses of pollinators to scent compounds is available.

Indexed as

OdorantsVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsFlowersPhenotypePheromonesPollinationPheromonesVolatile Organic Compoundsfloral fragrancefloral scentnatural selectionplant-pollinator interactionsreduced-rank regressionselection gradient

Identifiers

PMID36177776
PMCPMC9828191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.