Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177658›Full record

ReviewPathogens and global health2023

Intermittent preventive treatment with Sulfadoxine pyrimethamine for malaria: a global overview and challenges affecting optimal drug uptake in pregnant women.

Rodrigue Roman Dongang Nana, Joseph Hawadak, Loick Pradel Kojom Foko, Amit Kumar, Shewta Chaudhry, Aditi Arya, Vineeta Singh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens and global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. IJID regions · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of the selected hematological profiles among malaria andJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Phytofabrication and characterization ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigue Roman Dongang NanaParasite Host Biology group, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, India.
Joseph HawadakParasite Host Biology group, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-9953
Loick Pradel Kojom FokoParasite Host Biology group, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4286-147X
Amit KumarParasite Host Biology group, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, India.
Shewta ChaudhryParasite Host Biology group, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, India.
Aditi AryaParasite Host Biology group, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, India.
Vineeta SinghParasite Host Biology group, ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-7394
National Institute of Malaria Research · INInstitut de Recherches Médicales et d’Etudes des Plantes Médicinales · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria in Pregnancy (MiP) leading to morbidity and mortality is a major public health problem that poses significant risk to pregnant women and their fetus. To cope with this alarming situation, administration of Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) drugs to pregnant women as an intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) from 16 weeks of gestation is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. We conducted a comprehensive search of published articles related to MiP in last 10 years with predefined keywords or their synonyms. The mapping of malaria in pregnant women showed a prevalence rate up to 35% in many countries. Although IPTp-SP has been implemented in endemic regions since several years but the IPTp-SP coverage percentage vary from country to country and continue to remain below the target of 80%. Major reasons for low IPTp-SP involve gestational age at first prenatal visit, level of education, place of residence, knowledge of IPTp-SP benefits, and use of antenatal services. Several challenges including the emergence of septuple and octuple SP-resistant parasites is reported from many countries which make the prophylactic use of IPTp-SP currently debatable. This narrative review addresses the barriers for optimal use of IPTp-SP and discusses alternative approaches to increase the use and effectiveness of SP intervention for preventing MiP. The COVID pandemic has drastically affected the public health disrupting the management of diseases worldwide. In view of this, a brief summary of COVID impact on MiP situation is also included.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsCOVID-19MalariaPregnancy Complications, ParasiticDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPregnancyPregnant PeoplePyrimethamineSulfadoxineAntimalarialsDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPharmaceutical PreparationsPyrimethamineSulfadoxineIPTp-SpMalarianarrative review, COVID-19pregnancyprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID36177658
PMCPMC10337642
OpenAlexW4298087375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.