Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177471›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Ruminal background of predisposed milk urea (MU) concentration in Holsteins.

Hanne Honerlagen, Henry Reyer, Dierck Segelke, Carolin Beatrix Maria Müller, Marie Christin Prahl, Siriluck Ponsuksili, Nares Trakooljul, Norbert Reinsch, Björn Kuhla, Klaus Wimmers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanne HonerlagenResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Henry ReyerResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Dierck SegelkeIT-Solutions for Animal Production, Vereinigte Informationssysteme Tierhaltung w.V. (vit), Verden, Germany.
Carolin Beatrix Maria MüllerResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Nutritional Physiology "Oskar Kellner", Dummerstorf, Germany.
Marie Christin PrahlResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Nutritional Physiology "Oskar Kellner", Dummerstorf, Germany.
Siriluck PonsuksiliResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Nares TrakooljulResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Norbert ReinschResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genetics and Biometry, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Björn KuhlaResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Nutritional Physiology "Oskar Kellner", Dummerstorf, Germany.
Klaus WimmersResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to reduce nitrogen (N) emissions are currently based on the optimization of dietary- N supply at average herd N requirements. The implementation of the considerable individual differences and predispositions in N- use efficiency and N- excretion in breeding programs is hampered by the difficulty of data collection. Cow individual milk urea (MU) concentration has been proposed as an easy-to-measure surrogate trait, but recent studies questioned its predictive power. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying predisposed higher (HMUg) or lower (LMUg) MU concentration in dairy cows is needed. Considering the complex N- metabolism in ruminants, the distinction between HMUg and LMUg could be based on differences in (i) the rumen microbial community, (ii) the host-specific transcription processes in the rumen villi, and (iii) the host-microbe interaction in the rumen. Therefore, rumen fluid and rumen epithelial samples from 10 HMUg and 10 LMUg cows were analyzed by 16S sequencing and HiSeq sequencing. In addition, the effect of dietary-N reduction on ruminal shifts was investigated in a second step. In total, 10 differentially abundant genera (DAG) were identified between HMUg and LMUg cows, elucidating greater abundances of ureolytic

Indexed as

dairy cowhost gene expressionmicrobe–host relationshipmilk urearumen microbiome

Identifiers

PMID36177471
PMCPMC9513179
OpenAlexW4295539765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.