Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177453›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Early care and support for young children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Uganda: The Baby Ubuntu feasibility trial.

Carol Nanyunja, Samantha Sadoo, Maya Kohli-Lynch, Ruth Nalugya, James Nyonyintono, Anita Muhumuza, Kenneth R Katumba, Emily Trautner, Brooke Magnusson, Daniel Kabugo and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Neonatal Medical Index (NMI) to Brazil.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Carol NanyunjaMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Samantha SadooLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Maya Kohli-LynchLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ruth NalugyaMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
James NyonyintonoKiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda.
Anita MuhumuzaMulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Kenneth R KatumbaMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Emily TrautnerLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Brooke MagnussonKiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda.
Daniel KabugoKiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda.
Frances M CowanDepartment of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maria ZuurmondLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Catherine MorganCerebral Palsy Alliance Research Institute, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Deborah LesterCanadian Red Cross, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Janet SeeleyMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Emily L WebbLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Christine OtaiKiwoko Hospital, Nakaseke, Uganda.
Giulia GrecoMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Margaret NampijjaMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Cally J TannMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00027/4Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Medical Research Council MR/V035274/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early care and support provision for young children with developmental disabilities is frequently lacking, yet has potential to improve child and family outcomes, and is crucial for promoting access to healthcare and early education. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, early evidence of impact and provider costs of the Baby Ubuntu participatory, peer-facilitated, group program for young children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Uganda. Materials and methods: A feasibility trial, with two parallel groups, compared Baby Ubuntu with standard care. Caregivers and children, aged 6-11 months with moderate-severe neurodevelopmental impairment, were recruited and followed for 12 months. Quantitative and qualitative methods captured information on feasibility (ability to recruit), acceptability (satisfactory attendance), preliminary evidence of impact (family quality of life) and provider costs. Results: One hundred twenty-six infants (median developmental quotient, 28.7) were recruited and randomized (63 per arm) over 9 months, demonstrating feasibility; 101 (80%) completed the 12-month follow-up assessment (9 died, 12 were lost to follow up, 4 withdrew). Of 63 randomized to the intervention, 59 survived (93%); of these, 51 (86%) attended ≥6 modules meeting acceptability criteria, and 49 (83%) completed the 12 month follow-up assessment. Qualitatively, Baby Ubuntu was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and facilitators. Enabling factors included community sensitization by local champions, positive and caring attitudes of facilitators toward children with disability, peer support, and the participatory approach to learning. Among 101 (86%) surviving children seen at 12 months, mixed methods evaluation provided qualitative evidence of impact on family knowledge, skills, and attitudes, however impact on a scored family quality of life tool was inconclusive. Barriers included stigma and exclusion, poverty, and the need to manage expectations around the child's progress. Total provider cost for delivering the program per participant was USD 232. Conclusion: A pilot feasibility trial of the Baby Ubuntu program found it to be feasible and acceptable to children, caregivers and healthcare workers in Uganda. A mixed methods evaluation provided rich programmatic learning including qualitative, but not quantitative, evidence of impact. The cost estimate represents a feasible intervention for this vulnerable group, encouraging financial sustainability at scale. Clinical trial registration: [https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44380971], identifier [ISRCTN44380971].

Indexed as

caregiverdevelopmental disabilityearly interventionfeasibility trialparenting programUgandayoung children

Identifiers

PMID36177453
PMCPMC9513138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.