Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177441›Full record

ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2022

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Psychosis-Specific Intensive Outpatient Program.

Erin Samplin, Adrienne Grzenda, Alaina Vandervoort Burns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erin SamplinDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles CA USA.
Adrienne GrzendaDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-6953
Alaina Vandervoort BurnsDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles CA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Intensive outpatient programs (IOPs) are rarely designed specifically to treat psychosis. In 2016 UCLA established the Thought Disorders Intensive Outpatient Program (TD IOP), combining a time-limited, group-based intervention called cognitive behavioral social skills training (CBSST) and medication management to treat individuals with psychosis. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of developing an IOP for individuals with psychosis and the effectiveness of the program in improving psychotic symptom severity. Methods: Adults were referred to the TD IOP from inpatient and outpatient settings. Programming included 3 hours of CBSST and 6 hours of additional groups weekly as well as individual psychiatry and social work services. Primary outcomes were symptom changes as measured at intake and discharge by the Clinician-Rated Dimensions of Psychosis Symptom Severity scale. Program feedback was solicited from a small subset of patients. Results: Of the 92 enrolled subjects, 71 completed the program (77.2%). Average length of stay was 52 ± 30 days across all enrolled. Participants showed significant ( Conclusions: The current study indicates that targeted treatment for psychosis is successful within an IOP framework, with minimal additional training required for Master's level clinicians. Participants demonstrated significant symptomatic relief from group-based, time-limited treatment. Further work is needed to determine the full range of program benefits on patient well-being and illness morbidity.

Identifiers

PMID36177441
PMCPMC9477231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.