Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177431›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2022

Assessment of knee and ankle proprioception during the third trimester of pregnancy and postpartum period among primiparous women: An observational longitudinal study.

Aditya Wakkar, Shubhangi P Patil

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06303245 (Combined Effects of Abdominal Binders and TENS on Post-operative Pain, Distress and Constipation in Puerperium Period After Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06303245 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Combined Effects of Abdominal Binders and TENS on Post-operative Pain, Distress and Constipation in Puerperium Period After Cesarean Section

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsCesarean Section, Complications, Wound, DehiscenceArmsABDOMINAL BINDERS, TENS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aditya WakkarClinical Therapist, Private Clinic, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Shubhangi P PatilDepartment of Community Health Physiotherapy, Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Pain Clinic of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women experience falls, particularly in the third trimester. In this population, physiological changes, as well as ligament laxity, might influence joint proprioception and do not return to normal during the postpartum period. The prevalence of falls during pregnancy and postpartum periods imposes a need to study proprioception in pregnant women and the postpartum period. MATERIALS AND

methodAn observational longitudinal study was conducted in June 2018 in outpatient clinic Chinchwad Pune. A total of 36 primiparous women were included in the study by using purposive sampling. The mean and standard deviation of the age was 25.92 (2.59). Proprioception was assessed for the knee joint and the ankle joint during the third trimester of pregnancy and 6

resultThe result revealed significant (

conclusionKnee proprioception and ankle proprioception were found to improve significantly during the postpartum period 6

Indexed as

Ankle proprioceptionknee proprioceptionpostpartum periodpregnancyreposition error

Identifiers

PMID36177431
PMCPMC9514273
OpenAlexW4288786671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.