Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177417›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2022

The relationship between childbirth self-efficacy and coping styles of problem based and emotive based in nulliparous pregnant women.

Mahsima Banaei Heravan, Sadaf Rashki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mahsima Banaei HeravanInstructor, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Pregnancy Health Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Sadaf RashkiMidwifery Student, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaginal childbirth is the most stressful physical and mental event for most women, which necessitates the use of coping styles. Furthermore, childbirth self-efficacy will be one of the effective factors to cope with this stressful situation and doing compatible behaviors with childbirth pain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between childbirth self-efficacy and coping styles of problem based and emotive based in nulliparous pregnant women. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study is a descriptive-correlational study that is done over 323 nulliparous pregnant women attending the health centers in the city of Zahedan in 2020-2021. Data were collected by participants' demographic questionnaire, childbirth self-efficacy questionnaire of Lowe, and coping styles questionnaire of Folkman and Lazarus. The data were analyzed using Spearman's correlation coefficient test, linear regressions model, and multiple regression in SPSS software version 22.

resultsResults of Spearman's correlation coefficient test showed a significant direct correlation between problem-based coping style and childbirth self-efficacy (

conclusionsAccording to the findings, nulliparous pregnant women should be responsible, have a positive reassessment of vaginal childbirth, plan to solve their problems, and look for social support (all of these are part of a problem-based coping style) to increase and improve their childbirth self-efficacy. Furthermore, designing appropriate educational interventions based on problem-based coping style is necessary.

Indexed as

Coping skillsdeliveryemotivenulliparitypregnant womenproblem basedself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID36177417
PMCPMC9514275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.