Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177197›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Flexibility in the social structure of male chimpanzees (

Gal Badihi, Kelsey Bodden, Klaus Zuberbühler, Liran Samuni, Catherine Hobaiter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gal BadihiSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, South Street, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK.
Kelsey BoddenSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, South Street, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK.
Klaus ZuberbühlerSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, South Street, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK.
Liran SamuniSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, South Street, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK.
Catherine HobaiterSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, South Street, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK.
University of St Andrews · GBHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals of social species experience competitive costs and social benefits of group living. Substantial flexibility in humans' social structure and the combination of different types of social structure with fission-fusion dynamics allow us to live in extremely large groups-overcoming some of the costs of group living while capitalizing on the benefits. Non-human species also show a range of social strategies to deal with this trade-off. Chimpanzees are an archetypical fission-fusion species, using dynamic changes in day-to-day association to moderate the costs of within-group competition. Using 4 years of association data from two neighbouring communities of East African chimpanzees (

Indexed as

fission–fusiongroup-livingprimaterangingsocialitysocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID36177197
PMCPMC9515636
OpenAlexW4297537670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.