ArticleRoyal Society open science2022
Single cell classification of macrophage subtypes by label-free cell signatures and machine learning.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic and morphologic characterization of ovine macrophage differentiation and polarization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Engineering macrophage responses through 3D scaffold microarchitecture.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- The M2 Macrophages Importance Role in Psoriasis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Review
- Integrative analysis of miRNA expression data reveals a minimal signature for tumour cells classification.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- 3D Bioprinted Tumor-Stroma Models of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Stem Cells for Preclinical Targeted Therapy Evaluation.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Molecular Imaging with Aquaporin-Based Reporter Genes: Quantitative Considerations from Monte Carlo Diffusion Simulations.ACS synthetic biology · 2023Article
- Unknown cell class distinction via neural network based scattering snapshot recognition.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophage phenotypes play a fundamental role in the immune response. The interplay and consequently the classification between these two functional subtypes is significant for many therapeutic applications. Albeit, a fast classification of macrophage phenotypes is challenging. For instance, image-based classification systems need cell staining and coloration, which is usually time- and cost-consuming, such as multiple cell surface markers, transcription factors and cytokine profiles are needed. A simple alternative would be to identify such cell types by using single-cell, label-free and high throughput light scattering pattern analyses combined with a straightforward machine learning-based classification. Here, we compared different machine learning algorithms to classify distinct macrophage phenotypes based on their optical signature obtained from an ad hoc developed wide-angle static light scattering apparatus. As the main result, we were able to identify unpolarized macrophages from M1- and M2-polarized phenotypes and distinguished them from naive monocytes with an average accuracy above 85%. Therefore, we suggest that optical single-cell signatures within a lab-on-a-chip approach along with machine learning could be used as a fast, affordable, non-invasive macrophage phenotyping tool to supersede resource-intensive cell labelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.