ArticleScanning2022
MRI View of Rehabilitation Methods to Relieve Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury in Dancers.
Article in Scanning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-06Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/1B387AAC5E09C67F4AF0C2043F3ECD
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to solve the problem of the difference in the diagnostic effect of different sequences of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations for anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries, the author proposes an MRI rehabilitation method to relieve anterior cruciate ligament injury in dancers. This method retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 60 patients with knee anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries in our hospital, and all patients were diagnosed with knee anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries. All patients underwent MRI 3D sequence and 2D sequence examination successively to compare anatomical measurements. This study aimed at comparing the measurements of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) between the two examination sequences; comparing the diagnosis; comparing the grading and judgment of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint between the two inspection sequences; and comparing the diagnostic coincidence rates of the two examination sequences in the complete tear of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments of the knee. Experimental results show that, in terms of PCL and ACL, the angle, thickness, and length of two-dimensional MRI examination were significantly different from those of MRI examination and anatomical measurement (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.