Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177128›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Zero-inflated count distributions for capture-mark-reencounter data.

Thomas V Riecke, Daniel Gibson, James S Sedinger, Michael Schaub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas V RieckeSwiss Ornithological Institute Sempach Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7998-5233
Daniel GibsonWarner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-1479
James S SedingerDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science University of Nevada Reno Nevada USA.
Michael SchaubSwiss Ornithological Institute Sempach Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-0557

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The estimation of demographic parameters is a key component of evolutionary demography and conservation biology. Capture-mark-recapture methods have served as a fundamental tool for estimating demographic parameters. The accurate estimation of demographic parameters in capture-mark-recapture studies depends on accurate modeling of the observation process. Classic capture-mark-recapture models typically model the observation process as a Bernoulli or categorical trial with detection probability conditional on a marked individual's availability for detection (e.g., alive, or alive and present in a study area). Alternatives to this approach are underused, but may have great utility in capture-recapture studies. In this paper, we explore a simple concept:

Indexed as

Bayesiancapture–mark–recapturegamma‐Poissonindividual heterogeneitymark‐resightrobust designtemporary emigrationzero‐inflation

Identifiers

PMID36177128
PMCPMC9463028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.