Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36177052›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Comparison between HIV self-testing and facility-based HIV testing approach on HIV early detection among men who have sex with men: A cross-sectional study.

Yi Zhou, Shaoli Huang, Mingting Cui, Zhihui Guo, Haotong Tang, Hang Lyu, Yuxin Ni, Ying Lu, Yunlong Feng, Yuyu Wang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yi ZhouDepartment of HIV Prevention, Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, China.
Shaoli HuangZhejiang University-University of Edinburgh Institute, Zhejiang University-University, Hangzhou, China.
Mingting CuiSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhihui GuoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Haotong TangFaculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macao, Macao SAR, China.
Hang LyuDepartment of HIV Prevention, Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, China.
Yuxin NiDermatology Hospital of South Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ying LuDermatology Hospital of South Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yunlong FengDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuyu WangDepartment of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Fengshi JingInstitute for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Shanzi HuangDepartment of HIV Prevention, Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, China.
Jiarun LiDepartment of HIV Prevention, Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, China.
Yao XuDepartment of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Science, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Wenhua MeiDepartment of HIV Prevention, Zhuhai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Zhuhai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To assess whether HIV self-testing (HIVST) has a better performance in identifying HIV-infected cases than the facility-based HIV testing (HIVFBT) approach. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among men who have sex with men (MSM) by using an online questionnaire (including information on sociodemographic, sexual biography, and HIV testing history) and blood samples (for limiting antigen avidity enzyme immunoassay, gene subtype testing, and taking confirmed HIV test). MSM who were firstly identified as HIV positive through HIVST and HIVFBT were compared. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to explore any association between both groups and their subgroups. Results: In total, 124 MSM HIV cases were identified from 2017 to 2021 in Zhuhai, China, including 60 identified through HIVST and 64 through HIVFBT. Participants in the HIVST group were younger (≤30 years, 76.7% Conclusions: The study showed that HIVST has better HIV early detection among MSM and that recent HIV infection cases mainly occur in younger and better-educated MSM. Compared with HIVFBT, HIVST is more accessible to the most at-risk population on time and tends to identify the case early. Further implementation studies are needed to fill the knowledge gap on this medical service model among MSM and other target populations.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesCross-Sectional StudiesHIV TestingHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSelf CareSelf-Testingfacility-based HIV testingHIV/AIDSHIV self-testingrecent infection testing algorithmsRITA

Identifiers

PMID36177052
PMCPMC9513029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.