SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in resectable esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a Systematic Review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment strategies for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy versus routine neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Mapping research trends in esophageal cancer immunotherapy: A decade of thematic evolution and emerging priorities.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Radiomics analysis of dual-layer spectral detector CT-derived iodine density maps for predicting the pathological complete response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Phytochemicals remodel antitumor immunity via the "microbiota-metabolite-receptor" axis: focus on colorectal cancer and immunotherapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
- Comparative study of the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes before and after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- The Impact of Tumor Volume Change Rate During Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy-immunotherapy and of the Timing to Surgery on Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Germline HLA-I genotypes predict pathologic response and survival outcomes in esophageal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- NewInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Outcomes of radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Neoadjuvant therapy-associated malignant phenotype score predicts prognosis and highlights the roles of MIF signaling and DUXAP8 in ESCC.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Tertiary lymphoid structures correlate with the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Superior Anticancer and Antifungal Activities of New Sulfanyl-Substituted Niclosamide Derivatives.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Opportunities and challenges in combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy in esophageal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Effectiveness and safety of camrelizumab-containing neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Localized Pancreatic Cancer: Challenges and Early Results.Cancers · 2023Review
- Neoadjuvant adebrelimab in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase 1b trial.Nature medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy (nICT) or chemoradiotherapy (nICRT) has been tested in resectable esophageal cancer. Nevertheless, efficacy and safety for this new strategy have not been clearly demonstrated. Patients and methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and scientific meetings were searched for eligible trials until June 30, 2022. The primary outcome of interest was pathological complete response (pCR). The random-effect model was used for statistical analysis. Results: Twenty-seven trials with 809 patients were identified. The estimated rates of pCR for nICRT and nICT were comparable (32.7%, 95% CI: 20.3%-45.1% vs 26.3%, 95% CI: 19.8%-32.8%; P = 0.37). As for safety, surgical resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical delay rate, and surgical mortality rate were similar between nICRT and nICT, while more grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed for nICRT (52.6%, 95% CI: 30.7%-74.5% vs 19.9%, 95% CI: 8.8%-31.0%; P = 0.01). In subgroup analysis, nICRT achieved higher pCR rate compared to nICT (56.2%, 95% CI: 41.0%-71.3% vs 27.2%, 95% CI: 20.2%-34.1%; P < 0.001) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) but adenocarcinoma. In patients receiving nICT, PD-L1 expression CPS ≥1 showed higher pCR rate compared to CPS <1 (51.3%, 95% CI: 41.4%-61.2% vs 26.6%, 95% CI: 8.6%-44.5%; P = 0.02); regimen of paclitaxel plus carboplatin/cisplatin (PC/TP) and 3-4 cycles of nICT did not lead to an significantly improved pCR rate compared to other chemotherapy regimens and 2 cycles of nICT, respectively, despite without increased toxicity. Conclusion: Both nICT and nICRT achieved promising pCR rates with acceptable tolerability, and nICRT was likely to have more antitumor efficacy compared to nICT for patients with SCC. PD-L1 status seemed to be predictive of pCR in patients receiving nICT; pCR rate did not appear to be greatly affected by CT regimen and increasing cycles of nICT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.