Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176855›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Motion Detection and Correction for Frame-Based Stereotactic Localization.

Mark Sedrak, Patrick Pezeshkian, David Purger, Siddharth Srivastava, Ross Anderson, Derek W Yecies, Elena Call, Suketu Khandhar, Keegan Balster, Ivan Bernstein and 2 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mark SedrakNeurosurgery, Northern California Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, USA.
Patrick PezeshkianNeurological Surgery, Stanford University Hospital, Palo Alto, USA.
David PurgerNeurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
Siddharth SrivastavaNeurological Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Redwood City, USA.
Ross AndersonNeurological Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Redwood City, USA.
Derek W YeciesNeurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Redwood City, USA.
Elena CallNeurology, Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Redwood City, USA.
Suketu KhandharNeurology, Kaiser Permanente Sacramento, Sacramento, USA.
Keegan BalsterResearch, Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Redwood City, USA.
Ivan BernsteinNeurological Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Redwood City, USA.
Diana M BruceNeurological Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Redwood City, Redwood City, USA.
Armando L Alaminos-BouzaMedical Physics, MEVIS Informática Médica Ltda., São Paulo, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frame-based stereotactic localization is an important step for targeting during a surgical procedure. The motion may cause artifacts in this step reducing the accuracy of surgical targeting. While modeling of motion in real-life scenarios may be difficult, herein we analyzed the case where motion was suspected to impact the localization step. In this case, a scan with and without motion was performed with a 3N localizer, allowing for a thorough analysis. Pseudo-bending of straight rods was seen when analyzing the data. This pseudo-bending appears to occur because head-frame motion during imaging acquisition decreases the accuracy of the subsequent reconstruction, which depends on Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) metadata to specify the slice-to-slice location that assumes embedded object stability. Comparison of single-slice and multi-slice stereotactic localization allowed for comparative errors for each slice in a volume. This comparative error demonstrated low error when the patient was under general anesthesia and presumed not to have moved, whereas a higher error was present during the scan with motion. Pseudo-bending can be corrected by using only localizer fiducial-based information to reorient the pixels in the volume, thus creating a reoriented localizer scan. Finally, targeting demonstrated a low error of 0.1 mm (+/- 0.1 mm) using this reoriented localizer scan, signifying that this method could be used to improve or recover from motion problems. Finally, it is concluded that stability and elimination of motion for all images utilized for stereotactic surgery are critical to ensure the best possible accuracy for the procedure.

Indexed as

cartesian coordinate systempreoperative localizationstereotactic and functionalstereotactic and functional neurosurgerystereotactic frame

Identifiers

PMID36176855
PMCPMC9510889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.