ArticleCureus2022
Stereotactic Radiosurgery in a Small Cell Lung Cancer Patient With Numerous Brain Metastases.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer characterized by its propensity to metastasize to the brain. When SCLC patients develop brain metastasis, the standard-of-care treatment is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), with the goal of treating both macroscopic and microscopic tumors. However, WBRT is found to be associated with significant morbidity including cognitive impairment. An emerging alternative to WBRT for SCLC is stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), supported by a recent multi-institutional series and meta-analysis. However, there is limited evidence on the use of SRS when there are greater than 15 lesions from any histology, much less SCLC, where the risk of microscopic disease is felt to be even higher. Here, we present the case of an adult female with extensive-stage SCLC who developed 23 brain metastases. Due to patient preference, these were treated with SRS to a total dose of 20 Gy in one fraction. The patient did not experience any radiation-induced toxicity, including radionecrosis, and had overall favorable intracranial control using SRS alone at the time of her death, which was due to extracranial disease progression. This case adds to the literature suggesting that SRS could be a reasonable option for patients with SCLC. It illustrates that it might be reasonable to seek to expand on who might be considered a candidate for SRS treatment, with a high number of lesions not necessarily representing imminent widespread intracranial disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.