ReviewCureus2022
A Review on Techniques and Biomaterials Used in 3D Bioprinting.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-throughput bioprinted 3D cultures for probing host-pathogen interactions in bioinspired microenvironments.RSC applied polymers · 2026Article
- Implications of Tissue Engineering for Tendon Repair and Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Investigating How All-Trans Retinoic Acid Polycaprolactone (atRA-PCL) Microparticles Alter the Material Properties of 3D Printed Fibrin Constructs.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Biomaterials for Protein Delivery: Opportunities and Challenges to Clinical Translation.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Improving tumor microenvironment assessment in chip systems through next-generation technology integration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Modelling of macrophage responses to biomaterialsFrontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Review
- Recent Developments in 3D Bio-Printing and Its Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Hyaluronic acid-based bioink improves the differentiation and network formation of neural progenitor cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a cutting-edge technology that has come to light recently and shows a promising potential whose progress will change the face of medicine. This article reviews the most commonly used techniques and biomaterials for 3D bioprinting. We will also look at the advantages and limitations of various techniques and biomaterials and get a comparative idea about them. In addition, we will also look at the recent applications of these techniques in different industries. This article aims to get a basic idea of the techniques and biomaterials used in 3D bioprinting, their advantages and limitations, and their recent applications in various fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.