Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176822›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

A Comparison of Different Surgical Treatments for Complex Anal Fistula: A Systematic Review.

Anam Zahra, Jyothirmai Malla, Ramaneshwar Selvaraj, Ravneet K Dhanoa, Sathish Venugopal, Shoukrie I Shoukrie, Tharun Y Selvamani, Ranim K Hamouda, Pousette Hamid

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Core-Out Fistulectomy Combined With Laser Ablation of the Trans-Sphincteric Fistula Tract: A Pilot Study of Efficacy and Safety.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Efficacy of anal duct ligation and muscle closure: A novel sphincter-preserving surgical technique for fistula-in-ano.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anam ZahraSurgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Jyothirmai MallaSurgery, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ramaneshwar SelvarajInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ravneet K DhanoaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sathish VenugopalNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Shoukrie I ShoukrieOrthopedics and Traumatology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Tharun Y SelvamaniInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ranim K HamoudaInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Pousette HamidNeurology, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fistula-in-ano is a common proctological condition that primarily affects younger people and leads to chronic morbidity. An anal fistula is divided into simple and complex fistulas. A complex fistula is a challenging problem due to higher recurrence rates and incontinence associated with surgery. Many new methods have been developed for the closure of complex fistula-in-ano, but there is no single best method. The aim of this study is to identify a superior surgical technique for treating complex/high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas (HCPFs). A literature search was done using PubMed and Google Scholar for the period of 2012-2021. Articles that contain surgical treatment for complex anal fistula in the English language published in the last 10 years were included. The types of studies included were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, systematic reviews, cohort studies, and traditional reviews. Articles excluded were those done more than 10 years ago, in other languages, and containing simple fistula management only. Nine studies were included in the review; a systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that no single method is effective. The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure seems to be a promising and effective technique as it has a low rate of fecal incontinence as compared to other methods. Biological techniques give variable success rates so does fistula plug (FP). Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) and rerouting seton give good results according to one study. Fistula plug gives variable results and is not a preferred method. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) seems to be a promising new technique for complex anal fistulas, but the data available is not enough to determine the best method. More randomized trials are required to compare traditional techniques and emerging new biological methods to see the best technique available.

Indexed as

draining setonendorectal advancement flapfecal incontinencehigh cryptoglandular perianal fistularectal fistula

Identifiers

PMID36176822
PMCPMC9512314
OpenAlexW4292702973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.