Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176692›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

A workflow for segmenting soil and plant X-ray computed tomography images with deep learning in Google's Colaboratory.

Devin A Rippner, Pranav V Raja, J Mason Earles, Mina Momayyezi, Alexander Buchko, Fiona V Duong, Elizabeth J Forrestel, Dilworth Y Parkinson, Kenneth A Shackel, Jeffrey L Neyhart and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Devin A RippnerHorticultural Crops Production and Genetic Improvement Research Unit-United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Prosser, WA, United States.
Pranav V RajaDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
J Mason EarlesDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Mina MomayyeziDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Alexander BuchkoDepartment of Computer Science, California Polytechnic and State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, United States.
Fiona V DuongDepartment of Integrative Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Elizabeth J ForrestelDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Dilworth Y ParkinsonAdvanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Kenneth A ShackelDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Jeffrey L NeyhartGenetic Improvement for Fruits and Vegetables Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Chatsworth, NJ, United States.
Andrew J McElroneDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray micro-computed tomography (X-ray μCT) has enabled the characterization of the properties and processes that take place in plants and soils at the micron scale. Despite the widespread use of this advanced technique, major limitations in both hardware and software limit the speed and accuracy of image processing and data analysis. Recent advances in machine learning, specifically the application of convolutional neural networks to image analysis, have enabled rapid and accurate segmentation of image data. Yet, challenges remain in applying convolutional neural networks to the analysis of environmentally and agriculturally relevant images. Specifically, there is a disconnect between the computer scientists and engineers, who build these AI/ML tools, and the potential end users in agricultural research, who may be unsure of how to apply these tools in their work. Additionally, the computing resources required for training and applying deep learning models are unique, more common to computer gaming systems or graphics design work, than to traditional computational systems. To navigate these challenges, we developed a modular workflow for applying convolutional neural networks to X-ray μCT images, using low-cost resources in Google's Colaboratory web application. Here we present the results of the workflow, illustrating how parameters can be optimized to achieve best results using example scans from walnut leaves, almond flower buds, and a soil aggregate. We expect that this framework will accelerate the adoption and use of emerging deep learning techniques within the plant and soil sciences.

Indexed as

deep learningmachine learning and AIplant physiologyplant sciencesoil aggregate analysissoil healthsoil scienceX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID36176692
PMCPMC9514790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.