Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176680›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Integrated proteomics and metabolomics analysis of rice leaves in response to rice straw return.

Shuangshuang Yan, Shengdan Gong, Kexin Sun, Jinwang Li, Hongming Zhang, Jinsheng Fan, Zhenping Gong, Zhongxue Zhang, Chao Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Comparative metabolite profiling of salt sensitivePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuangshuang YanCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Shengdan GongCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Kexin SunCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Jinwang LiCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Hongming ZhangCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Jinsheng FanInstitute of Forage and Grassland Sciences, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Zhenping GongCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Zhongxue ZhangCollege of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Chao YanCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Straw return is crucial for the sustainable development of rice planting, but no consistent results were observed for the effect of straw return on rice growth. To investigate the response of rice leaves to rice straw return in Northeast China, two treatments were set, no straw return (S0) and rice straw return (SR). We analyzed the physiological index of rice leaves and measured differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) and differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) levels in rice leaves by the use of proteomics and metabolomics approaches. The results showed that, compared with the S0 treatment, the SR treatment significantly decreased the dry weight of rice plants and non-structural carbohydrate contents and destroyed the chloroplast ultrastructure. In rice leaves of SR treatment, 329 DEPs were upregulated, 303 DEPs were downregulated, 44 DEMs were upregulated, and 71 DEMs were downregulated. These DEPs were mainly involved in photosynthesis and oxidative phosphorylation, and DEMs were mainly involved in alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, galactose metabolism, glycerophospholipid metabolism, pentose and gluconic acid metabolism, and other metabolic pathways. Rice straw return promoted the accumulation of scavenging substances of active oxygen and osmotic adjustment substances, such as glutathione, organic acids, amino acids, and other substances. The SR treatment reduced the photosynthetic capacity and energy production of carbon metabolism, inhibiting the growth of rice plants, while the increase of metabolites involved in defense against abiotic stress enhanced the adaptability of rice plants to straw return stress.

Indexed as

leafmetabolomicsplant growthproteomicsricerice straw return

Identifiers

PMID36176680
PMCPMC9514043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.