ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2022
Portable hand-held bioprinters promote in situ tissue regeneration.
Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Handheld Bioprinters in Skin Regeneration: Current Landscape, Clinical Promise, and the Road Ahead.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The Promise of 3D Biomaterial Bioprinting for Wound-Healing and Skin Tissue Restoration.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Portable Bioprinter in Ischemic Wound Therapy: a Pilot Study.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2026Article
- An Overview of 3D Bioprinting Impact on Cell Viability: From Damage Assessment to Protection Solutions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Bioengineering of Periodontal Tissues: Cell Therapy and Biomaterials Application.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancing Bioprinting Technology Utilizing Portable Bioprinters: From Various Device Designs to Dental Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Review
- Photochemical corneal cross-linking: Evaluating the potential of a hand-held biopen.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Development of silk microfiber-reinforced bioink for muscle tissue engineering and in situ printing by a handheld 3D printer.Biomaterials advances · 2025Article
- Improving Thermosensitive Bioink Scaffold Fabrication with a Temperature-Regulated Printhead in Robot-AssistedACS omega · 2024Article
- Arthroscopic device with bendable tip for the controlled extrusion of hydrogels on cartilage defects.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- 3D-bioprinted GelMA/gelatin/amniotic membrane extract (AME) scaffold loaded with keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells for skin tissue engineering.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Porous Hydrogels for Immunomodulatory Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Improving physio-mechanical and biological properties of 3D-printed PLA scaffolds via in-situ argon cold plasma treatment.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- Recent advances on 3D-printed PCL-based composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Commercial articulated collaborativeInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Portable hand-held bioprinters promote in situ tissue regeneration.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
- Development ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Clinical translation of 3D bioprinting in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction: Recent progress and future directions.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional bioprinting, as a novel technique of fabricating engineered tissues, is positively correlated with the ultimate goal of regenerative medicine, which is the restoration, reconstruction, and repair of lost and/or damaged tissue function. The progressive trend of this technology resulted in developing the portable hand-held bioprinters, which could be used quite easily by surgeons and physicians. With the advent of portable hand-held bioprinters, the obstacles and challenges of utilizing statistical bioprinters could be resolved. This review attempts to discuss the advantages and challenges of portable hand-held bioprinters via in situ tissue regeneration. All the tissues that have been investigated by this approach were reviewed, including skin, cartilage, bone, dental, and skeletal muscle regeneration, while the tissues that could be regenerated via this approach are targeted in the authors' perspective. The design and applications of hand-held bioprinters were discussed widely, and the marketed printers were introduced. It has been prospected that these facilities could ameliorate translating the regenerative medicine science from the bench to the bedside actively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.