Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176617›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2022

Adaptive multi-degree-of-freedom in situ bioprinting robot for hair-follicle-inclusive skin repair: A preliminary study conducted in mice.

Wenxiang Zhao, Haiyan Chen, Yi Zhang, Dezhi Zhou, Lun Liang, Boxun Liu, Tao Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Fundamental research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Development and Quantitative Evaluation of a Novel AutonomousIEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenxiang ZhaoBiomanufacturing and Rapid Forming Technology Key Laboratory of Beijing, Department of Mechanical Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing People's Republic of China.
Haiyan ChenThe National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Animal Peptide Drug Development College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University Changsha Hunan People's Republic of China.
Yi ZhangTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University Shenzhen People's Republic of China.
Dezhi ZhouBiomanufacturing and Rapid Forming Technology Key Laboratory of Beijing, Department of Mechanical Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing People's Republic of China.
Lun LiangEast China Institute of Digital Medical Engineering Shangrao People's Republic of China.
Boxun LiuTsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University Shenzhen People's Republic of China.
Tao XuBiomanufacturing and Rapid Forming Technology Key Laboratory of Beijing, Department of Mechanical Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5783-6859
Tsinghua University · CNHunan Normal University · CNInstitute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin acts as an essential barrier, protecting organisms from their environment. For skin trauma caused by accidental injuries, rapid healing, personalization, and functionality are vital requirements in clinical, which are the bottlenecks hindering the translation of skin repair from benchside to bedside. Herein, we described a novel design and a proof-of-concept demonstration of an adaptive bioprinting robot to proceed rapid in situ bioprinting on a full-thickness excisional wound in mice. The three-dimensional (3D) scanning and closed-loop visual system integrated in the robot and the multi-degree-of-freedom mechanism provide immediate, precise, and complete wound coverage through stereotactic bioprinting, which hits the key requirements of rapid-healing and personalization in skin repair. Combined with the robot, epidermal stem cells and skin-derived precursors isolated from neonatal mice mixed with Matrigel were directly printed into the injured area to replicate the skin structure. Excisional wounds after bioprinting showed complete wound healing and functional skin tissue regeneration that closely resembling native skin, including epidermis, dermis, blood vessels, hair follicles and sebaceous glands etc. This study provides an effective strategy for skin repair through the combination of the novel robot and a bioactive bioink, and has a promising clinical translational potential for further applications.

Indexed as

automated bioprintinghair follicle regenerationin situ bioprintingskin repairtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID36176617
PMCPMC9472011
OpenAlexW4214661456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.