Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176609›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2022

Cell loaded hydrogel containing Ag-doped bioactive glass-ceramic nanoparticles as skin substitute: Antibacterial properties, immune response, and scarless cutaneous wound regeneration.

Esmaeel Sharifi, Seyede Athar Sadati, Satar Yousefiasl, Rossella Sartorius, Mahdi Zafari, Leila Rezakhani, Morteza Alizadeh, Ehsan Nazarzadeh Zare, Shadi Omidghaemi, Fatemeh Ghanavatinejad and 9 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Nanoclays for wound management applications.Drug delivery and translational research · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Esmaeel SharifiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute Shahrekord University of Medical Science Shahrekord Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3400-3106
Seyede Athar SadatiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute Shahrekord University of Medical Science Shahrekord Iran.
Satar YousefiaslSchool of Dentistry Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Hamadan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9876-6220
Rossella SartoriusInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC) National Research Council (CNR) Naples Italy.
Mahdi ZafariNational Cell Bank, Pasteur Institute of Iran Tehran Iran.
Leila RezakhaniFertility and Infertility Research Center Health Technology Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences Kermanshah Iran.
Morteza AlizadehDepartment of Tissue Engineering, School of Medicine Shahroud University of Medical Sciences Shahroud Iran.
Ehsan Nazarzadeh ZareSchool of Chemistry Damghan University Damghan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0446-4385
Shadi OmidghaemiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute Shahrekord University of Medical Science Shahrekord Iran.
Fatemeh GhanavatinejadCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute Shahrekord University of Medical Science Shahrekord Iran.
Mohammad-Saeid JamiCellular and Molecular Research Center, Basic Health Sciences Institute Shahrekord University of Medical Science Shahrekord Iran.
Erfan SalahinejadFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering K. N. Toosi University of Technology Tehran Iran.
Hadi SamadianDental Implants Research Center Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Hamadan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-5709
Ana Cláudia Paiva-SantosDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy University of Coimbra Coimbra Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-6000
Piergiuseppe De BerardinisInstitute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (IBBC) National Research Council (CNR) Naples Italy.
Abbas ShafieeUQ Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8885-9025
Franklin R TayThe Graduate School, Augusta University Augusta Georgia USA.
Samiramis PourmotabedDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine Hamadan University of Medical Sciences Hamadan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7844-0773
Pooyan MakvandiSchool of Chemistry Damghan University Damghan Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2456-0961
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRShahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRNational Research Council · ITDamghan University · IRKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IRK.N.Toosi University of Technology · IRPasteur Institute of Iran · IRPiaggio (Italy) · ITRede de Química e Tecnologia · PTShahroud University of Medical Sciences · IRThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ideal tissue-engineered dermal substitute should possess angiogenesis potential to promote wound healing, antibacterial activity to relieve the bacterial burden on skin, as well as sufficient porosity for air and moisture exchange. In light of this, a glass-ceramic (GC) has been incorporated into chitosan and gelatin electrospun nanofibers (240-360 nm), which MEFs were loaded on it for healing acceleration. The GC was doped with silver to improve the antibacterial activity. The bioactive nanofibrous scaffolds demonstrated antibacterial and superior antibiofilm activities against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. The nanofibrous scaffolds were biocompatible, hemocompatible, and promoted cell attachment and proliferation. Nanofibrous skin substitutes with or without Ag-doped GC nanoparticles did not induce an inflammatory response and attenuated LPS-induced interleukin-6 release by dendritic cells. The rate of biodegradation of the nanocomposite was similar to the rate of skin regeneration under in vivo conditions. Histopathological evaluation of full-thickness excisional wounds in BALB/c mice treated with mouse embryonic fibroblasts-loaded nanofibrous scaffolds showed enhanced angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis as well as regeneration of the sebaceous glands and hair follicles in vivo.

Indexed as

Ag‐doped bioactive glass–ceramicsanti‐biofilmhemocompatibleimmunogenicityskin substitutewound healing

Identifiers

PMID36176609
PMCPMC9471996
OpenAlexW4287958699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.