Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176572›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2022

Urban Soil Safety Policies: The Next Frontier for Mitigating Lead Exposures and Promoting Sustainable Food Production.

Sara N Lupolt, Raychel E Santo, Brent F Kim, Thomas A Burke, Keeve E Nachman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara N LupoltDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
Raychel E SantoDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7091-6263
Brent F KimDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
Thomas A BurkeRisk Sciences and Public Policy Institute Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.
Keeve E NachmanDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-4151

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban soils bear the persistent legacy of leaded gasoline and past industrial practices. Soil safety policies (SSPs) are an important public health tool with the potential to inform, identify, and mitigate potential health risks faced by urban growers, but little is known about how these policies may protect growers from exposures to lead and other soil contaminants. We reviewed and evaluated 43 urban agriculture (UA) policies in 40 US cities pertaining to soil safety. About half of these cities had a least one SSP that offered recommendations or provided services for soil testing. Eight cities had at least one SSP containing a requirement pertaining to any topic (e.g., soil testing, a specific best practice for growing). We found notable inconsistencies across SSPs for "acceptable" levels of lead in soils and the activities and behaviors recommended at each level. We specify research needed to inform revisions to US Environmental Protection Agency guidance for lead in soils specific to UA. We conclude with a series of recommendations to guide the development or revision of SSPs.

Indexed as

environmental justiceexposureleadpolicysoil safetyurban agriculture

Identifiers

PMID36176572
PMCPMC9473349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.