ReviewNew microbes and new infections2022
Tick-borne encephalitis in pregnant women: A mini narrative review.
Review in New microbes and new infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tick-Borne Encephalitis in the 21Le infezioni in medicina · 2026Review
- Tick-Borne Diseases and Pregnancy: A Narrative Review Evaluating Pregnancy Complications Caused by Tick-Borne Diseases.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Tick-Borne Encephalitis Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2023.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) incidence has been increasing in Europe the last decades, but very few cases in pregnant women have been described. We present two cases and describe the serology of both mother and infant at the time of diagnosis and delivery, as well as at months 3, 6, 9, and 12 of follow-up. In both cases, pregnancies and infants developed normally. The mothers had moderate-to severe symptoms of TBE and were positive for IgM and IgG at the time of diagnosis, and throughout the follow up period whilst both infants were PCR- and IgM-negative and positive for IgG during their first months in life. Declining IgG titres were seen in the infants during follow-up until they became negative at the age of nine months. TBE IgG was vertically transmitted in these two cases of infants born to TBE-infected mothers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.