Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Best Practice in the chemical characterisation of extracts used in pharmacological and toxicological research-The ConPhyMP-Guidelines.

Michael Heinrich, Banaz Jalil, Mona Abdel-Tawab, Javier Echeverria, Žarko Kulić, Lyndy J McGaw, John M Pezzuto, Olivier Potterat, Jia-Bo Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 275 papers, 38 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
275citing papers in PubMed, 38 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

275 citing papers in PubMed, 38 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Efficacy and mechanisms ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

215 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael HeinrichPharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom.
Banaz JalilPharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, United Kingdom.
Mona Abdel-TawabCentral Laboratory of German Pharmacists, Eschborn, Germany/Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Javier EcheverriaDepartamento de Ciencias del Ambiente, Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Žarko KulićPreclinical Research and Development, Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Lyndy J McGawPhytomedicine Programme, Department of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
John M PezzutoCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, United States.
Olivier PotteratDivision of Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jia-Bo WangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

analytical methodsBest practiceextract characterisationHPLCHPTLCmedicinal plantphytochemical analysis

Identifiers

PMID36176427
PMCPMC9514875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.