ArticleMethodsX2022
An operational guide to resin 3D printing of geological macromodels.
Article in MethodsX, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereolithography (SLA) is a form of 3D printing that is based on the curing of resin under UV light. There are a wide variety of 3D resin printers on the market that all follow the same general procedure. First, a slicing program is used to slice the model in a sequence of thin layers. The model will be printed in this sequence of layers after it is exported in a format recognizable by a 3D printer. In addition to this main function, slicing programs offer additional features to manipulate the model, adjust print settings, and add model supports. Next, after the printer is set up, the sliced model is loaded onto the printer and fabricated. Once the print is complete, the model can be washed, cured and sanded/polished to the desired finish. In this work, we utilize SLA 3D printing to print geological macromodels, to be utilized in flooding experiments. Images captured from the flooding experiments were then incorporated in a set of visual learning exercises for undergraduate students to enhance the study of immiscible fluid flow in porous media. SLA printing was selected in this use case as it provides important advantages over other common 3D printing technologies (e.g. Fused Depositional Modelling: FDM), such as high print resolvability of sub-millimeter scale pore geometry and a high degree of transparency within the resultant printed models. Overall, this method was found to:•Provide an engaging learning experience for undergraduate students, as the captured flooding experiment image time series allowed students to directly visualize often obtuse fluid flow processes in porous media.•Be easily reproducible: after completing an initial print the method can be reproduced for many different pore networks, allowing for a wide array of comparative studies and learning exercises to be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.