ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Survey of Glasgow Coma Scale and PaO
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship between growth differentiation factor 15 and functional prognosis and severity in traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Accurately calculating the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is essential for medical resource allocation and decision-making. This study surveyed Japanese intensive care units regarding their assessment of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and PaO Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted among healthcare workers. The survey consisted of questions about the intensive care units where they work and questions for respondents. It was distributed to healthcare workers by e-mail through the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine mailing list and social networking service. Results: Among 414 responses, we obtained 211 valid responses and 175 survey results from unique intensive care units. When assessing GCS in patients under the influence of sedatives, 45.1% (95% confidence interval, 37.6-52.8) of intensive care units assessed GCS assuming that the sedatives had no influence. For the PaO Conclusion: In patients under the influence of sedatives, approximately half of the intensive care units assessed assumed GCS. There was variation in the methods used to assess the PaO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.