ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2022
Differences in the neural networks of thermal sensation with and without evaluation process.
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of sustained mild dehydration on thermoregulatory and cognitive functions during prolonged moderate exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several neuroimaging studies have analyzed the neural networks involved in thermal sensation. In some of these studies, participants were instructed to evaluate and report the thermal sensation using a point scale, visual analog scale, or other psychophysical rating tool while the imaging data were obtained. Therefore, the imaging data may reflect signals involved in the processes of both sensation and evaluation. The present study aimed to discriminate the neural networks involved in identifying different temperature stimuli and the two different processes by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We applied four different thermal stimuli ("hot," 40C; "warm," 36 °C, "cool," 27 °C; and "cold," 22 °C) to the left forearm using Peltier apparatus. During the stimuli, participants were instructed to either evaluate (evaluation task) or not evaluate (no-evaluation task) and report the thermal sensation. We found brain activation in the medial prefrontal cortex/anterior cingulate gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral insula, and posterior parietal cortex during the four thermal stimuli both with and without the evaluation task. Additionally, the stimuli with the evaluation task induced stronger and broader activation, including the right fronto-parietal and anterior insula regions. These results indicate that thermal stimulation activates the common neural networks, independent of the thermal conditions and evaluation process. Moreover, the evaluation process may increase the attention to the thermal stimuli, resulting in the activation of the right lateralized ventral attentional network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.