Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36176264›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Imaging and physician visits at cancer diagnosis: COVID -19 pandemic impact on cancer care.

Rui Fu, Rinku Sutradhar, Qing Li, Timothy P Hanna, Kelvin K W Chan, Natalie Coburn, Julie Hallet, Antoine Eskander, Pandemic-Ontario Collaborative in Cancer Research (POCCR)

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Head and Neck Cancers Medical Costs in a Universal Health System: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rui FuICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0577-2830
Rinku SutradharICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0320-6042
Qing LiICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Timothy P HannaDivision of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3228-6042
Kelvin K W ChanOdette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2501-3057
Natalie CoburnICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5313-717X
Julie HalletICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5108-1072
Antoine EskanderICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-1393
Pandemic-Ontario Collaborative in Cancer Research (POCCR)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the COVID-19 pandemic impact on the provision of diagnostic imaging and physician visits at cancer diagnosis.

methodsWe used administrative databases from Ontario, Canada, to identify MRI/CT/ultrasound scans and in-person/virtual physician visits conducted with cancer patients within 91 days around the date of diagnosis in 2016-2020. In separate segmented regression procedures, we assessed the trends in weekly volume of these services per thousand cancer patients in prepandemic (June 26, 2016 to March 14, 2020), the change in mean volume at the start of the pandemic, and the additional change in weekly volume during the pandemic (March 15, 2020, to September 26, 2020).

resultsTotally, 403,561 cancer patients were included. On March 15, 2020 (COVID-19 arrived), mean scan volume decreased by 12.3% (95% CI: 6.4%-17.9%) where ultrasound decreased the most by 31.8% (95% CI: 23.9%-37.0%). Afterward, the volume of all scans increased further by 1.6% per week (95% CI: 1.3%-2.0%), where ultrasound increased the fastest by 2.4% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.9%). Mean in-person visits dropped by 47.4% when COVID-19 started (95% CI: 41.6%-52.6%) while virtual visits rose by 55.15-fold (95% CI: 4927%-6173%). In the pandemic (until September 26, 2020), in-person visits increased each week by 2.6% (95% CI: 2.0%-3.2%), but no change was observed for virtual visits (p -value = 0.10).

conclusionsProvision of diagnostic imaging and virtual visits at cancer diagnosis has been increasing since the start of COVID-19 and has exceeded prepandemic utilization levels. Future work should monitor the impact of these shifts on quality of delivered care.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsPhysiciansHumansOntarioPandemicsTomography, X-Ray Computedcancer diagnosisCOVID-19diagnostic imagingtelemedicineultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36176264
PMCPMC10028129
OpenAlexW4298087125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read2
measurements read151
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.