Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175961›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2022

Enhancing therapeutic anti-cancer responses by combining immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibition.

Roger J Daly, Andrew M Scott, Oliver Klein, Matthias Ernst

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Margin-enriched CD4International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. AttenuatedActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roger J DalyCancer Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, 23 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia. Roger.Daly@monash.edu.
Andrew M ScottDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Monash University, 23 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Oliver KleinOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute and La Trobe University School of Cancer Medicine, 145 Studley Rd, Melbourne-Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
Matthias ErnstDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Monash University, 23 Innovation Walk, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia. Matthias.Ernst@onjcri.org.au.
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AULa Trobe University · AUMonash University · AUOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been established as the standard of care for many types of cancer, but the strategies employed have continued to evolve. Recently, much clinical focus has been on combining targeted therapies with ICI for the purpose of manipulating the immune setpoint. The latter concept describes the equilibrium between factors that promote and those that suppress anti-cancer immunity. Besides tumor mutational load and other cancer cell-intrinsic determinants, the immune setpoint is also governed by the cells of the tumor microenvironment and how they are coerced by cancer cells to support the survival and growth of the tumor. These regulatory mechanisms provide therapeutic opportunities to intervene and reduce immune suppression via application of small molecule inhibitors and antibody-based therapies against (receptor) tyrosine kinases and thereby improve the response to ICIs. This article reviews how tyrosine kinase signaling in the tumor microenvironment can promote immune suppression and highlights how therapeutic strategies directed against specific tyrosine kinases can be used to lower the immune setpoint and elicit more effective anti-tumor immunity.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesTumor MicroenvironmentTyrosineImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesTyrosineCTLA-4Immuno-oncologyPD-1PD-L1Targeted therapyTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID36175961
PMCPMC9523960
OpenAlexW4297996219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.