Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175936›Full record

Trial reportTrials2022

Observation on the effectiveness and safety of sodium bicarbonate Ringer's solution in the early resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhagic shock: a clinical single-center prospective randomized controlled trial.

Jizhe Zhang, Dong Han, Kun Zhang, Weiqiang Guan, Li Li, Zhengtao Gu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blood transfusion strategies for major bleeding in trauma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jizhe Zhang *Department of Treatment Center For Traumatic Injuries, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8269-1885
Dong Han *Department of Quality Control and Evaluation, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Kun ZhangDepartment of Treatment Center For Traumatic Injuries, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Weiqiang GuanDepartment of Treatment Center For Traumatic Injuries, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Li LiDepartment of Treatment Center For Traumatic Injuries, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. li435319585@smu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-8667
Zhengtao GuDepartment of Treatment Center For Traumatic Injuries, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. yytao700@smu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8566-6634
Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic hemorrhagic shock (THS) is the main cause of death in trauma patients with high mortality. Rapid control of the source of bleeding and early resuscitation are crucial to clinical treatment. Guidelines recommend isotonic crystal resuscitation when blood products are not immediately available. However, the selection of isotonic crystals has been controversial. Sodium bicarbonate Ringer solutions (BRS), containing sodium bicarbonate, electrolyte levels, and osmotic pressures closer to plasma, are ideal. Therefore, in this study, we will focus on the effects of BRS on the first 6 h of resuscitation, complications, and 7-day survival in patients with THS.

methods/design. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial will focus on the efficacy and safety of BRS in early THS resuscitation. A total of 400 adults THS patients will be enrolled in this study. In addition to providing standard care, enrolled patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive resuscitation with BRS (test group) or sodium lactate Ringer's solution (control group) until successful resuscitation from THS. Lactate clearance at different time points (0.5, 1, 1.5, 3, and 6 h) and shock duration after drug administration will be compared between the two groups as primary end points. Secondary end points will compare coagulation function, temperature, acidosis, inflammatory mediator levels, recurrence of shock, complications, medication use, and 7-day mortality between the two groups. Patients will be followed up until discharge or 7 days after discharge. DISCUSSION: At present, there are still great differences in the selection of resuscitation fluids, and there is a lack of systematic and detailed studies to compare and observe the effects of various resuscitation fluids on the effectiveness and safety of early resuscitation in THS patients. This trial will provide important clinical data for resuscitation fluid selection and exploration of safe dose of BRS in THS patients.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ChiCTR2100045044. Registered on 4 April 2021.

Indexed as

Shock, HemorrhagicAdultElectrolytesFluid TherapyHemorrhageHumansInflammation MediatorsIsotonic SolutionsProspective StudiesResuscitationRinger's SolutionSodium BicarbonateSodium LactateElectrolytesInflammation MediatorsIsotonic SolutionsRinger's SolutionSodium BicarbonateSodium LactateFluid resuscitationLactate clearanceSodium bicarbonate Ringer’s solutionTraumatic hemorrhagic shock

Identifiers

PMID36175936
PMCPMC9523956
OpenAlexW4297962996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.