Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175902›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2022

Comparison between acupotomy and corticosteroid injection for patients diagnosed with different classifications of tennis elbow: a randomized control trial.

Lin-Pu Ge, Xiao-Qian Liu, Rui-Kun Zhang, Zhi-Neng Chen, Feng Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lin-Pu Ge *Department of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, Zhejiang, China.
Xiao-Qian Liu *Department of Endocrinology, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, 310007, China.
Rui-Kun ZhangZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China.
Zhi-Neng ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, Zhejiang, China.
Feng ChengDepartment of Orthopedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310005, Zhejiang, China. chengfeng8302@163.com.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNHangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNZhejiang Chinese Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTennis elbow has long been one of the most controversial subjects in orthopaedics. Many scholars thought the use of open or arthroscopic surgery was reserved for patients with refractory symptoms. Therapy with percutaneous acupotomy performed under local anaesthesia also removes degenerated tissue, releases strain, and therefore provides an alternative treatment option to surgical excision.

methodsThe aim of this single-blinded randomized control trial was to examine the long-term clinical effectiveness of a nonsurgical percutaneous release technique (acupotomy) and the current recommended treatment (steroid injection) in people diagnosed with a refractory tennis elbow. Ninety patients with refractory symptoms were included. The intervention period was 6 weeks. According to the classification, 38 patients had extra-articular tennis elbow, 36 patients had intraarticular tennis elbow, and 16 patients had mixed type tennis elbow. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to treatment with percutaneous release by acupotomy according to their classified condition, and 45 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with steroid injection alone. The visual analogue scale (VAS), a tenderness assessment, a grip assessment, and the Nirschl staging system were used for outcome evaluation at pretreatment and the posttreatment timepoints from 12 to 48 weeks.

resultsDuring the first weeks, there were no differences observed between the groups. By 6, 24 and 48 weeks, significant differences were observed between the two groups. The acupotomy group scored significantly better in visual analogue scale score (VAS) of pain, tenderness during palpation, pain-free grip strength (PFGS) and Nirschl staging than the corticosteroid group.

conclusionsFor patients with lateral epicondylitis, acupotomy is just as effective as corticosteroid injections in the short term (< 6 weeks). In the long term, acupotomy has greater efficacy and is associated with a lower rate of recurrence than corticosteroid injections in the management of lateral epicondylitis.

trial registrationThe National Health Commission announced the "ethical review measures for biomedical research involving people" in 2019, which was not mandatory in previous studies.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyTennis ElbowAdrenal Cortex HormonesArthroscopyHumansSteroidsTreatment OutcomeAdrenal Cortex HormonesSteroidsAcupotomyAlternative medicinesClassificationCorticosteroidSingle RCTTennis elbow

Identifiers

PMID36175902
PMCPMC9524077
OpenAlexW4297963069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.