Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175856›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Confronting implicit bias toward patients: a scoping review of post-graduate physician curricula.

S T Gleicher, M A Chalmiers, B Aiyanyor, R Jain, N Kotha, K Scott, R S Song, J Tram, C L Vuong, J Kesselheim

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implicit Bias in Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Implementation of a Healthcare Implicit Bias Training across Three Oncology Care Settings.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

S T GleicherNeurology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA. Gleicher@uw.edu.
M A ChalmiersSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
B AiyanyorPediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
R JainPediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
N KothaSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
K ScottNeonatal Intensive Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA.
R S SongEmory University, Atlanta, USA.
J TramSchool of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.
C L VuongEmergency Medicine, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, USA.
J KesselheimDFCI/BCH Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USAdvocate Christ Medical Center · USEmory University · USHarvard University · USSeattle University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysicians' behavior may unknowingly be impacted by prejudice and thereby contribute to healthcare inequities. Despite increasingly robust data demonstrating physician implicit bias (The Office of Minority Health. Minority Population Profiles, 2021; COVID-19 Shines Light on Health Disparities, National Conference of State Legislatures 2021), the evidence behind how to change this with training programs remains unclear. This scoping review therefore reports on the implementation, outcomes, and characteristics of post-graduate physician implicit bias curricula.

methodsThe authors conducted a literature review using scoping review methodology. They searched 7 databases in February and November 2020 for English-language academic and gray literature on implicit bias curricula for physicians at all levels of post-graduate training. Ten reviewers screened studies for eligibility independently, then extracted data from these studies and compiled it into a chart and analytical summary.

resultsOf the 4,599 articles screened, this review identified 90 articles on implicit bias interventions for post-graduate physicians. Inductive data analysis revealed a spectrum of educational approaches, which were categorized int o 4 educational models called Competence, Skills-Based, Social Contact, and Critical Models. The most commonly reported strength was the interactive nature of the curricula (26%), and the most frequently identified challenges were related to time and resources available (53%). Half of the interventions discussed facilitator preparation, and the majority (62%) evaluated outcomes using pre and post self-assessments.

conclusionsThis review provides a comprehensive synthesis of the literature on physician implicit bias curricula. It is our goal that this supports medical educators in applying and improving aspects of these interventions in their own programs.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansBias, ImplicitCurriculumHumansModels, EducationalCurriculumImplicit biasPost graduate medical educationPrejudiceStereotype

Identifiers

PMID36175856
PMCPMC9520104
OpenAlexW4298004959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.