Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175758›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

A Qualitative Study of Perspectives of Older Adults on Deintensifying Diabetes Medications.

Scott J Pilla, Kayla A Meza, Nancy L Schoenborn, Cynthia M Boyd, Nisa M Maruthur, Geetanjali Chander

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Navigating Medication Risk in the ED: Communication Preferences of Older Adults Regarding Deprescribing.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Crossing the deintensification chasm for older adults with diabetes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott J PillaDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. spilla1@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-9047
Kayla A MezaDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nancy L SchoenbornDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cynthia M BoydDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nisa M MaruthurDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Geetanjali ChanderDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

U.S. Deprescribing Research NetworkR24AG064025 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA, STEINMAN, MICHAEL A. · 2019 to 2023
$9.9M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003099 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GEBO, KELLY A · 2019 to 2023
$7.9M
Mentoring and Patient Oriented Research at the Nexus of Unhealthy Alcohol Use and HIVK24AA027483 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GEETANJALI CHANDER · 2019 to 2026
$1.3M
Patient-Centered Care for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Research and Mentoring ProgramK24AG056578 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
Improving cancer screening in older adults with limited life expectancyK76AG059984 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOENBORN, NANCY · 2018 to 2021
$972k
An intervention to enhance hypoglycemia communication and preventive action in primary careK23DK128572 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PILLA, SCOTT · 2021 to 2024
$790k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003099NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA027483NIAAA NIH HHS K24AA027483NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056578NIA NIH HHS K24AG056578NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059984NIA NIH HHS K76AG059984NIA NIH HHS R24 AG064025NIA NIH HHS R24AG064025NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK128572NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK128572NIH HHS KL2TR003099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile many older adults with type 2 diabetes have tight glycemic control beyond guideline-recommended targets, deintensifying (stopping or dose-reducing) diabetes medications rarely occurs.

objectiveTo explore the perspectives of older adults with type 2 diabetes around deintensifying diabetes medications.

designThis qualitative study used individual semi-structured interviews, which included three clinical scenarios where deintensification may be indicated.

participantsTwenty-four adults aged ≥65 years with medication-treated type 2 diabetes and hemoglobin A1c <7.5% were included (to thematic saturation) using a maximal variation sampling strategy for diabetes treatment and physician specialty. APPROACH: Interviews were independently coded by two investigators and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. We identified major themes and subthemes and coded responses to the clinical scenarios as positive (in favor of deintensification), negative, or ambiguous. KEY

resultsParticipants' mean age was 74 years, half were women, and 58% used a sulfonylurea or insulin. The first of four major themes was fear of losing control of diabetes, which participants weighed against the benefits of taking less medication (Theme 2). Few participants viewed glycemic control below target as a reason for deintensification and a majority would restart the medication if their home glucose increased. Some participants were anchored to their current diabetes treatment (Theme 3) driven by unrealistic views of medication benefits. A trusting patient-provider relationship (Theme 4) was a positive influence. In clinical scenarios, 8%, 4%, and 75% of participants viewed deintensification positively in the setting of poor health, limited life expectancy, and high hypoglycemia risk, respectively.

conclusionsOptimizing deintensification requires patient education that describes both individualized glycemic targets and how they will change over the lifespan. Deintensification is an opportunity for shared decision-making, but providers must understand patients' beliefs about their medications and address misconceptions. Hypoglycemia prevention may be a helpful framing for discussing deintensification.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypoglycemiaAgedFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleSulfonylurea CompoundsGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsSulfonylurea Compoundsadverse reactionsagingdeprescriptionsdiabetes mellitus, type 2drug-related side effectshypoglycemia

Identifiers

PMID36175758
PMCPMC10039184
OpenAlexW4298006438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.