SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023
Periacetabular osteotomy to treat hip dysplasia: a systematic review of harms and benefits.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative outcomes of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy in adolescents, young adults, and middle-aged adults : a minimum two-year follow-up.Bone & joint open · 2026Article
- A Qualitative Study of the Decision-Making and Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults With Acetabular Dysplasia Regarding Periacetabular Osteotomy.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Early postoperative complications following periacetabular osteotomy: a single-center cohort study on 1,356 consecutive procedures.Acta orthopaedica · 2025Article
- Periacetabular Osteotomy Often Results in Inpatient Stay: A Tertiary Referral Institution's Experience Supporting This Common Postoperative Course.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Long-term course of borderline dysplasia: a 26-year follow-up of nonoperative hips in patients undergoing unilateral acetabular rotational osteotomy.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Triple-Osteotomy leads to substantially improved quality of life in patients with hip dysplasia.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Hip preservation surgery for borderline and frank dysplasia: an overview of systematic reviews.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- [Complication management after periacetabular osteotomy].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeriacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is often performed in patients with hip dysplasia. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the harms and benefits of PAO in patients with hip dysplasia in studies reporting both adverse events and patient-reported hip pain and function. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search combing PAO and patient-reported outcomes was performed in the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Sports Discuss and PsychINFO. Studies including both harms and benefits defined as adverse events and patient-reported hip pain and function were included. Risk of bias was assessed using The Cochrane Risk of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions.
resultsTwenty-nine cohort studies were included, of which six studies included a comparison group. The majority of studies had serious risk of bias and the certainty of evidence was very low. The proportion of adverse events was 4.3 (95% CI 3.7; 4.9) for major adverse events and 14.0 (95% CI 13.0; 15.1) for minor adverse events. Peroneal nerve dysfunction was the most frequent adverse event among the major adverse events, followed by acetabular necrosis and delayed union or non-union. All patient-reported hip pain and function scores improved and exceeded the minimal clinically important differences after PAO. After 5 years, scores were still higher than the preoperative scores.
conclusionPAO surgery has a 4% risk of major, and 14% risk of minor adverse events and a positive effect on patient-reported hip pain and function among patients with hip dysplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.