Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175594›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2022

LncRNA THOR promotes endometrial cancer progression through the AKT and ERK signaling pathways.

Han-Qiu Zhang, Tao Li, Cheng Li, Hong-Tao Hu, Si-Meng Zhu, Jia-Qi Lu, Xiao-Jun Chen, He-Feng Huang, Yan-Ting Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. LncRNAs signatures in gynecological cancers: ovarian and endometrial cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Han-Qiu Zhang *International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tao Li *International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Cheng LiObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hong-Tao HuDepartment of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Si-Meng ZhuInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jia-Qi LuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao-Jun ChenObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
He-Feng HuangInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. huanghefg@sjtu.edu.cn.
Yan-Ting WuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. yanting_wu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-1792
Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences 2019-I2M-5-064Clinical Research Plan of SHDC SHDC2020CR1008ACollaborative Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 2020CXJQ01National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFC2700701National Natural Science Foundation of China 82088102National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171686Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader 20XD1424100Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center SHDC12018X17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) THOR is highly conserved and expressed in various human cancer tissues, although its potential role and underlying mechanism in endometrial cancer (EC) remain unknown. This study aims to explore THOR's biological function and molecular mechanism in EC progression. THOR expression in EC tissues and cell lines was detected by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and in situ hybridization (ISH). THOR expression based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and clinical sample analyses was significantly higher in EC tissues than normal tissues, and higher THOR levels were closely associated with poor overall survival in EC. Additionally, a positive correlation between ISH-detected THOR expression and pathological grade was observed. CCK-8, colony formation, and transwell migration and invasion assays revealed that THOR significantly enhances the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of EC cells. Moreover, IGF2BP1 protein expression and ERK and AKT protein phosphorylation levels in EC cells increased significantly with THOR overexpression in EC cells. In conclusion, our findings suggest that THOR promotes EC cell growth and invasion, and IGF2BP1-mediated AKT and ERK signaling pathways activation might be involved. Clinically, THOR is significantly expressed in EC, and high THOR expression correlates with poor prognosis, making it a potential prognostic marker for EC.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsRNA, Long NoncodingFemaleHumansProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktSignal TransductionSincalideProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktRNA, Long NoncodingSincalideEndometrial cancerERK/AKT pathwayIGF2BP1lncRNATHOR

Identifiers

PMID36175594
OpenAlexW4297990130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.