Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175588›Full record

Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2022

Phase II study of sodium valproate in combination with oral etoposide in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Thejeswar Nakka, Luxitaa Goenka, Biswajit Dubashi, Smita Kayal, Jayanthi Mathaiyan, Deepak Barathi, Narendran Krishnamoorthy, Divya Bala Thumaty, Sindhu Dahagama, Prasanth Ganesan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thejeswar NakkaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Luxitaa GoenkaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Biswajit DubashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Smita KayalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Jayanthi MathaiyanDepartment of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Deepak BarathiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India.
Narendran KrishnamoorthyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Divya Bala ThumatyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Sindhu DahagamaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India.
Prasanth GanesanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), 3rd Floor, Super Speciality Block, Dhanvantari Nagar, Puducherry, 605006, India. pg1980@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-6591
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) have limited therapeutic options and poor survival. There is a need for the development of newer therapies. Sodium valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with antitumor activity in preclinical models of PROC. Synergism with conventional cytotoxic agents like etoposide has been demonstrated. In this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study, we included patients ≥ 18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed PROC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0-3. Patients received oral VPA 60 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 3 days (D1-D3), followed by oral etoposide 50 mg once daily for two consecutive weeks (D4-D17). Serum samples were collected to assess peak VPA drug levels. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. We sought to show an improvement in response rate from 25% (historically with oral etoposide) to 40% with the addition of VPA. 27 patients were enrolled in the study, and 18 [median age: 52 (45-59) years; serous histology:17 (94%); ECOG-PS 2 or 3: 14 (78%)] were evaluable for the response after 4 months. Nine patients were lost from follow-up before achieving the primary endpoint (mainly due to Covid-related lockdown issues). The median number of prior lines of treatment was 2 (1-3). ORR was 0% according to GCIG criteria. The disease was stable in two patients [clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 11%]. The median OS and PFS were 7 months and 2 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were reported in 6 (33%) patients. The addition of valproic acid to oral etoposide in patients with PROC and poor general condition was not helpful and failed to improve responses compared to those historically achieved with single-agent etoposide. However, further phase 2 randomized controlled trials with larger sample size can be done to confirm the findings.

Indexed as

COVID-19Lymphoma, FollicularOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCommunicable Disease ControlCytotoxinsEtoposideFemaleHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSodiumValproic AcidCytotoxinsEtoposideHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesSodiumValproic AcidAdvanced ovarian cancerHDAC inhibitorsOral etoposidePlatinum resistanceValproic acid

Identifiers

PMID36175588
PMCPMC9522437
OpenAlexW4297963630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.