ArticleScientific reports2022
A tree-based scan statistic for zero-inflated count data in post-market drug safety surveillance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adverse Reactions Identified after Approval of Novel Medicines: Analysis of 339 New Molecular Entities and Therapeutic Biologics.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Charting and Sidestepping the Pitfalls of Disproportionality Analysis.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Mapping the applications and methodological characteristics of the TreeScan method in pharmacovigilance and beyond: a scoping review of 44 studies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Computation of the distribution of model accuracy statistics in machine learning: Comparison between analytically derived distributions and simulation-based methods.Health science reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After new drugs enter the market, adverse events (AE) induced by their use must be tracked; rare AEs may not be detected during clinical trials. Some organizations have been collecting information on suspected drugs and AEs via a spontaneous reporting system to conduct post-market drug safety surveillance. These organizations use the information to detect a signal representing potential causality between drugs and AEs. The drug and AE data are often hierarchically structured. Accordingly, the tree-based scan statistic can be used as a statistical data mining method for signal detection. Most of the AE databases contain a large number of zero-count cells. Notably, not only an observational zero from the Poisson distribution, but also a true zero exists in zero-count cells. True zeros represent theoretically impossible observations or possible but unreported observations. The existing tree-based scan statistic assumes that all zeros are zero-valued observations from the Poisson distribution. Therefore, true zeros are not considered in the modeling, which can lead to bias in the inferences. In this study, we propose a tree-based scan statistic for zero-inflated count data in a hierarchical structure. According to our simulation study, in the presence of excess zeros, our proposed tree-based scan statistic provides better performance than the existing tree-based scan statistic. The two methods were illustrated using Korea Adverse Event Reporting System data from the Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.