ArticleScientific reports2022
m6A RNA methylation regulator-related signatures exhibit good prognosis prediction ability for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of IFI27 in HNSCC and functional analysis under ALKBH5 regulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- NCancer gene therapy · 2025Article
- Expression and prognostic significance of the m6A RNA methylation regulator HNRNPC in HNSCC.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The expression of Methyltransferase-like 3 in dentigerous cyst and ameloblastoma.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
- N6-methyladenosine RNA modification in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): current status and future insights.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has become the sixth most common malignant disease worldwide and is associated with high mortality, with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 50%. Recent studies have demonstrated that aberrantly expressed m6A regulators are involved in multiple biological and pathological processes, including cancers, but the specific mechanisms of m6A regulators in HNSCC are not well elucidated. In this study, we adopted The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-HNSCC database and performed a consensus clustering analysis to classify the HNSCC samples. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was applied to construct an m6A signature-based HNSCC risk prediction model. Cell type identification based on estimating relative subsets of RNA transcripts (CIBERSORT) algorithms was adopted to evaluate the immune cell infiltration level in the tumor microenvironment. Based on the expression of m6A regulators in HNSCC, we identified two clusters, cluster 1 (C1) and cluster 2 (C2). C2 showed a better prognosis than C1 and was mainly enriched in the HIPPO, MYC, NOTCH, and NRF signaling pathways. We constructed an m6A signature-based risk score model and classified patients into high- and low-risk score subgroups. The high-risk-score group showed poor clinical characteristics, higher immune infiltration levels, higher chemokine and chemokine receptor expression levels, and lower immune checkpoint gene expression than the low-risk-score subgroup. In conclusion, our comprehensive analysis suggests that the m6A signature-based risk score might function as a good prognostic predictor. Our study may provide novel therapeutic clues and help predict the prognosis of HNSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.