ArticleCommunications biology2022
Following the niche: the differential impact of the last glacial maximum on four European ungulates.
Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Endocrine Signaling Axis in Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: Interactions and Therapeutic Potential of FGF21 and GDF15.Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Genetically diverse populations hold the keys to climatic adaptation in the Western barn owl (Tyto alba).Communications biology · 2026Article
- Pan-African model explainsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Malaria shaped human spatial organization for the past 74 thousand years.Science advances · 2026Article
- roadDB: An R package for exploring early human prehistory and environments with the ROCEEH Out of Africa Database.PloS one · 2026Article
- High-quality genome assembly of Chironomus riparius and its population history in European populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Spatial Change of Dominant Baltic Sea Demersal Fish Across Two Decades.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Archaeogenomic insights into commensalism and regional variation in pig management in Neolithic northwest Europe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Evaluating Past Range Shifts and Niche Dynamics of Giant Pandas Since the Last Interglacial.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The genomic natural history of the aurochs.Nature · 2024Article
- Future changes in society and climate may strongly shape wild large-herbivore faunas across Europe.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the effects of future global changes on species requires a better understanding of the ecological niche dynamics in response to climate; the large climatic fluctuations of the last 50,000 years can be used as a natural experiment to that aim. Here we test whether the realized niche of horse, aurochs, red deer, and wild boar changed between 47,000 and 7500 years ago using paleoecological modelling over an extensive archaeological database. We show that they all changed their niche, with species-specific responses to climate fluctuations. We also suggest that they survived the climatic turnovers thanks to their flexibility and by expanding their niche in response to the extinction of competitors and predators. Irrespective of the mechanism behind such processes, the fact that species with long generation times can change their niche over thousands of years cautions against assuming it to stay constant both when reconstructing the past and predicting the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.