Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175448›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Deciphering microbial gene function using natural language processing.

Danielle Miller, Adi Stern, David Burstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle MillerThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3039-4376
Adi SternThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 6997801, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-2919-3542
David BursteinThe Shmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, 6997801, Israel. davidbur@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-6219-1880
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revealing the function of uncharacterized genes is a fundamental challenge in an era of ever-increasing volumes of sequencing data. Here, we present a concept for tackling this challenge using deep learning methodologies adopted from natural language processing (NLP). We repurpose NLP algorithms to model "gene semantics" based on a biological corpus of more than 360 million microbial genes within their genomic context. We use the language models to predict functional categories for 56,617 genes and find that out of 1369 genes associated with recently discovered defense systems, 98% are inferred correctly. We then systematically evaluate the "discovery potential" of different functional categories, pinpointing those with the most genes yet to be characterized. Finally, we demonstrate our method's ability to discover systems associated with microbial interaction and defense. Our results highlight that combining microbial genomics and language models is a promising avenue for revealing gene functions in microbes.

Indexed as

Genes, MicrobialNatural Language ProcessingGenomicsMicrobial InteractionsSemantics

Identifiers

PMID36175448
PMCPMC9523054
OpenAlexW4298006192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.