Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175409›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Systematic identification of intron retention associated variants from massive publicly available transcriptome sequencing data.

Yuichi Shiraishi, Ai Okada, Kenichi Chiba, Asuka Kawachi, Ikuko Omori, Raúl Nicolás Mateos, Naoko Iida, Hirofumi Yamauchi, Kenjiro Kosaki, Akihide Yoshimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. RNA Sequencing in Disease Diagnosis.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2024
    Review
  10. Clinical and Molecular Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuichi Shiraishi *Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan. yuishira@ncc.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-6144-5845
Ai Okada *Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi ChibaDivision of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Asuka KawachiCancer RNA Research Unit, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Ikuko OmoriCancer RNA Research Unit, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Raúl Nicolás MateosDivision of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoko IidaDivision of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi YamauchiCancer RNA Research Unit, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenjiro KosakiCenter for Medical Genetics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihide YoshimiCancer RNA Research Unit, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0664-7281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many disease-associated genomic variants disrupt gene function through abnormal splicing. With the advancement of genomic medicine, identifying disease-associated splicing associated variants has become more important than ever. Most bioinformatics approaches to detect splicing associated variants require both genome and transcriptomic data. However, there are not many datasets where both of them are available. In this study, we develop a methodology to detect genomic variants that cause splicing changes (more specifically, intron retention), using transcriptome sequencing data alone. After evaluating its sensitivity and precision, we apply it to 230,988 transcriptome sequencing data from the publicly available repository and identified 27,049 intron retention associated variants (IRAVs). In addition, by exploring positional relationships with variants registered in existing disease databases, we extract 3,000 putative disease-associated IRAVs, which range from cancer drivers to variants linked with autosomal recessive disorders. The in-silico screening framework demonstrates the possibility of near-automatically acquiring medical knowledge, making the most of massively accumulated publicly available sequencing data. Collections of IRAVs identified in this study are available through IRAVDB ( https://iravdb.io/ ).

Indexed as

RNA SplicingTranscriptomeExome SequencingIntronsLevamisoleMutation3-aminolevamisoleLevamisole

Identifiers

PMID36175409
PMCPMC9522810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.