Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175300›Full record

ReviewHearing research2022

Spectro-temporal modulation glimpsing for speech intelligibility prediction.

Amin Edraki, Wai-Yip Chan, Jesper Jensen, Daniel Fogerty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amin EdrakiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada. Electronic address: a.edraki@queensu.ca.
Wai-Yip ChanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Jesper JensenDepartment of Electronic Systems, Aalborg University, Aalborg 9220, Denmark; Demant A/S, Smørum 2765, Denmark.
Daniel FogertyDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.

Funding

Maximizing speech recognition under adverse listening conditionsR01DC015465 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FOGERTY, DANIEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compare two alternative speech intelligibility prediction algorithms: time-frequency glimpse proportion (GP) and spectro-temporal glimpsing index (STGI). Both algorithms hypothesize that listeners understand speech in challenging acoustic environments by "glimpsing" partially available information from degraded speech. GP defines glimpses as those time-frequency regions whose local signal-to-noise ratio is above a certain threshold and estimates intelligibility as the proportion of the time-frequency regions glimpsed. STGI, on the other hand, applies glimpsing to the spectro-temporal modulation (STM) domain and uses a similarity measure based on the normalized cross-correlation between the STM envelopes of the clean and degraded speech signals to estimate intelligibility as the proportion of the STM channels glimpsed. Our experimental results demonstrate that STGI extends the notion of glimpsing proportion to a wider range of distortions, including non-linear signal processing, and outperforms GP for the additive uncorrelated noise datasets we tested. Furthermore, the results show that spectro-temporal modulation analysis enables STGI to account for the effects of masker type on speech intelligibility, leading to superior performance over GP in modulated noise datasets.

Indexed as

Speech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationNoisePerceptual MaskingSignal-To-Noise RatioGlimpsingSpectro-temporal modulationSpeech intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID36175300
PMCPMC10125146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.