ReviewHearing research2022
Spectro-temporal modulation glimpsing for speech intelligibility prediction.
Review in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attenuation and distortion components of age-related hearing loss: Contributions to recognizing temporal-envelope filtered speech in modulated noise.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Speech emotion analysis using convolutional neural network (CNN) and gamma classifier-based error correcting output codes (ECOC).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Sentence recognition with modulation-filtered speech segments for younger and older adults: Effects of hearing impairment and cognition.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We compare two alternative speech intelligibility prediction algorithms: time-frequency glimpse proportion (GP) and spectro-temporal glimpsing index (STGI). Both algorithms hypothesize that listeners understand speech in challenging acoustic environments by "glimpsing" partially available information from degraded speech. GP defines glimpses as those time-frequency regions whose local signal-to-noise ratio is above a certain threshold and estimates intelligibility as the proportion of the time-frequency regions glimpsed. STGI, on the other hand, applies glimpsing to the spectro-temporal modulation (STM) domain and uses a similarity measure based on the normalized cross-correlation between the STM envelopes of the clean and degraded speech signals to estimate intelligibility as the proportion of the STM channels glimpsed. Our experimental results demonstrate that STGI extends the notion of glimpsing proportion to a wider range of distortions, including non-linear signal processing, and outperforms GP for the additive uncorrelated noise datasets we tested. Furthermore, the results show that spectro-temporal modulation analysis enables STGI to account for the effects of masker type on speech intelligibility, leading to superior performance over GP in modulated noise datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.