Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175099›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Protocol for a pragmatic feasibility randomised controlled trial of peer coaching for adults with long-term conditions: PEER CONNECT.

Rachel Dennett, Tom Thompson, Wendy Clyne, Agne Straukiene, Helen Davies-Cox, Joanne Hosking, Krystina Bones, Olivia Weight, Julian Elston

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachel DennettTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK rachel.dennett@plymouth.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0400-0502
Tom ThompsonPeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Wendy ClynePeninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Agne StraukieneTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK.
Helen Davies-CoxTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK.
Joanne HoskingMedical Statistics, Peninsula Medical School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Krystina BonesTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK.
Olivia WeightTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK.
Julian ElstonTorbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with low levels of knowledge, skills and confidence to manage their health and well-being (activation) are more likely to have unmet health needs, delay seeking healthcare and need emergency care. National Health Service England estimates that this may be applicable to 25%-40% of patients with long-term health conditions. Volunteer peer coaching may support people to increase their level of activation. This form of intervention may be particularly effective for people with low levels of activation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single site, two-arm randomised controlled trial has been designed to assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial of volunteer peer health and well-being coaching for people with long-term health conditions (multiple sclerosis, rheumatic diseases or chronic pain) and low activation. Feasibility outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, and intervention adherence. We will measure patient activation, mental health and well-being as potential outcomes for a definitive trial. These outcomes will be summarised descriptively for each time point by allocated group and help to inform sample size calculation for the definitive trial. Criteria for progression to a full trial will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the London - Surrey Research Ethics Committee, reference 21/LO/0715. Results from this feasibility trial will be shared directly with participants, presented at local, regional and national conferences and published in an open-access journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12623577.

Indexed as

MentoringAdultEthics Committees, ResearchFeasibility StudiesHumansPeer GroupPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicState MedicineNeurologyProtocols & guidelinesQuality in health careRheumatology

Identifiers

PMID36175099
PMCPMC9528622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.