Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175091›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Study protocol: primary healthcare transformation through patient-centred medical homes-improving access, relational care and outcomes in an urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population, a mixed methods prospective cohort study.

Danielle Butler, Anton Clifford-Motopi, Saira Mathew, Carmel Nelson, Renee Brown, Karen Gardner, Lyle Turner, Leanne Coombe, Yvette Roe, Yu Gao and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle ButlerInstitute for Urban Indigenous Health Ltd, Windsor, Queensland, Australia Danielle.Butler@anu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-4544
Anton Clifford-MotopiInstitute for Urban Indigenous Health Ltd, Windsor, Queensland, Australia.
Saira MathewInstitute for Urban Indigenous Health Ltd, Windsor, Queensland, Australia.
Carmel NelsonInstitute for Urban Indigenous Health Ltd, Windsor, Queensland, Australia.
Renee BrownInstitute for Urban Indigenous Health Ltd, Windsor, Queensland, Australia.
Karen GardnerBusiness School, University of New South Wales Canberra at ADFA, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Lyle TurnerInstitute for Urban Indigenous Health Ltd, Windsor, Queensland, Australia.
Leanne CoombeUQ Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Yvette RoeCharles Darwin University, Casuarina, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Yu GaoCharles Darwin University, Casuarina, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
James WardUQ Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
ISoC2 Study Team members
Institute for Urban Indigenous Health · AUCharles Darwin University · AUAustralian National University · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor over 40 years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community-Controlled Health Services (ACCHS) in Australia have led strategic responses to address the specific needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. Globally, there has been rapid growth in urban Indigenous populations requiring an adaptive primary healthcare response. Patient-centred medical homes (PCMH) are an evidenced-based model of primary healthcare suited to this challenge, underpinned by principles aligned with the ACCHS sector-relational care responsive to patient identified healthcare priorities. Evidence is lacking on the implementation and effectiveness of the PCMH model of care governed by, and delivered for, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations in large urban settings. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: Our multiphased mixed-methods prospective cohort study will compare standard care provided by a network of ACCHS to an adapted PCMH model of care. Phase 1 using qualitative interviews with staff and patients and quantitative analysis of routine primary care health record data will examine the implementation, feasibility and acceptability of the PCMH. Phase 2 using linked survey, primary care and hospitalisation data will examine the impact of our adapted PCMH on access to care, relational and quality of care, health and wellbeing outcomes and economic costs. Phase 3 will synthesise evidence on mechanisms for change and discuss their implications for sustainability and transferability of PCMHs to the broader primary healthcare system ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received approval from the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/HE00529). This research represents an Aboriginal led and governed partnership in response to identified community priorities. The findings will contribute new knowledge on how key mechanisms underpinning the success and implementation of the model can be introduced into policy and practice. Study findings will be disseminated to service providers, researchers, policymakers and, most importantly, the communities themselves.

Indexed as

Indigenous PeoplesPatient-Centered CareAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesHumansProspective StudiesRacial GroupsUrban PopulationEPIDEMIOLOGYPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36175091
PMCPMC9528615
OpenAlexW4298008753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.