Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36175082›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Successful Reperfusion is Associated with Favorable Functional Outcome despite Vessel Perforation during Thrombectomy: A Case Series and Systematic Review.

C Ducroux, W Boisseau, A Y Poppe, N Daneault, Y Deschaintre, J D B Diestro, J Eneling, L C Gioia, D Iancu, B Maier and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of bail-out techniques for managing cerebral vessel perforation: An experimental study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

C DucrouxFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8938-9494
W BoisseauRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0001-8120-5128
A Y PoppeFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-2635
N DaneaultFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada.
Y DeschaintreFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8778-3818
J D B DiestroRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0001-8450-2021
J EnelingRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).
L C GioiaFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1992-0718
D IancuRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0003-2041-9178
B MaierRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0003-3993-1024
B NaucheBibliothèque du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (B.N.), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7707-1718
L NicoRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0003-2680-8916
C OdierFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada.
J RaymondRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0003-1978-4274
D RoyRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0002-6066-4453
C StapfFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3193-1006
A WeillRadiology (W.B., J.D.B.D., J.E., D.I., B.M., L.N., J.R., D.R., A.W.).ORCID 0000-0002-0281-6201
G JacquinFrom the Department of Neurosciences (C.D., A.Y.P., N.D., Y.D. L.C.G., C.O., C.S., G.J.), Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec. Canada gregory.jacquin.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4362-1571
I.R.C.C.S. Oasi Maria SS · ITJisc · GBCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAFondation de Rothschild · FROttawa Hospital · CAUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArterial perforation is a potentially serious complication during endovascular thrombectomy. PURPOSE: Our aim was to describe interventional approaches after arterial perforation during endovascular thrombectomy and to determine whether reperfusion remains associated with favorable outcome despite this complication. DATA SOURCES: Data from consecutive patients with acute stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy were retrospectively collected between 2015 to 2020 from a single-center cohort, and a systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid MEDLINE up to June 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Articles reporting functional outcome after arterial perforation during endovascular thrombectomy were selected. DATA ANALYSIS: Functional outcomes of patients achieving successful reperfusion (TICI 2b/3) were compared with outcomes of those with unsuccessful reperfusion in our single-center cohort. We then summarized the literature review to describe interventional approaches and outcomes after arterial perforation during endovascular thrombectomy. DATA SYNTHESIS: In our single-center cohort, 1419 patients underwent endovascular thrombectomy, among whom 32 (2.3%) had vessel perforation and were included in the analysis. The most common hemostatic strategy was watchful waiting (71% of cases). Patients with successful reperfusion had a higher proportion of favorable 90-day mRS scores (60% versus 12.5%; LIMITATIONS: Given the low number of published reports, we performed only a descriptive analysis.

conclusionsArterial perforation during endovascular thrombectomy is rare but is associated with high mortality rates and poor outcome. However, successful reperfusion remains correlated with favorable outcome in these patients.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresStrokeHumansReperfusionRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36175082
PMCPMC9731237
OpenAlexW4297996599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.