Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36174888›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2022

Memory recall: New behavioral protocols for examining distinct forms of context specific recall in animals.

A Prodan, H Davies, H Eneqvist, G Mastroberardino, H Wijayathunga, K Wardlaw, R G M Morris

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modelling of What-Where-When Everyday Memories in Rats.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A ProdanLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
H DaviesLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
H EneqvistLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
G MastroberardinoLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
H WijayathungaLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
K WardlawLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK.
R G M MorrisLaboratory for Cognitive Neuroscience, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, 1 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, UK. Electronic address: r.g.m.morris@ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207481Wellcome Trust 207481/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study outlines two novel protocols for examining context specific recall in animals prior to embarking on neurobiological studies. The approach is distinct from and contrasts with studies investigating associative familiarity that depend upon procedural variations of the widely used novel object recognition task. It uses an event arena in which animals are trained across numerous sessions to search for, find and dig up reward from sandwells during sample and choice trials - a prominent spatial event for a rodent. The arena could be laid out as either of two highly distinct contexts with which the animals became fully familiar throughout training. In one protocol, the location of the correct sandwell in each context remained stable across days, whereas in the other, the correct digging location varied in a counterbalanced manner across each successive session. Thus, context-specific recall of the spatial location of successful digging during choice trials was either from a stable long-term memory or could reflect context specific spatial recency of the location where reward had been available that session. Both protocols revealed effective memory recall in choice and probe tests which, at the point of test, were procedurally identical in both cases.

Indexed as

MemoryMental RecallAnimalsRecognition, PsychologyRewardVisual PerceptionAllocentric spatial representationContext specific recallContext-specific recencyEpisodic memoryEvent arena

Identifiers

PMID36174888
PMCPMC7614818
OpenAlexW4297141428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.