ArticleBiosensors & bioelectronics2022
Ultrasensitive monitoring of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses based on a digital approach reveals one week of IgG seroconversion.
Article in Biosensors & bioelectronics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bead-based microfluidic platforms for multiplex and ultrasensitive immunoassays in clinical diagnosis and treatment.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2024Review
- SARS-CoV-2 peptides/epitopes for specific and sensitive diagnosis.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
COVID-19 is still unfolding, while many people have been vaccinated. In comparison to nucleic acid testing (NAT), antibody-based immunoassays are faster and more convenient. However, its application has been hampered by its lower sensitivity and the existing fact that by traditional immunoassays, the measurable seroconversion time of pathogen-specific antibodies, such as IgM or IgG, lags far behind that of nucleic acids. Herein, by combining the single molecule array platform (Simoa), RBD, and a previously identified SARS-CoV-2 S2 protein derivatized 12-aa peptide (S2-78), we developed and optimized an ultrasensitive assay (UIM-COVID-19 assay). Sera collected from three sources were tested, i.e., convalescents, inactivated virus vaccine-immunized donors and wild-type authentic SARS-CoV-2-infected rhesus monkeys. The sensitivities of UIM-COVID-19 assays are 100-10,000 times higher than those of conventional flow cytometry, which is a relatively sensitive detection method at present. For the established UIM-COVID-19 assay using RBD as a probe, the IgG and IgM seroconversion times after vaccination were 7.5 and 8.6 days vs. 21.4 and 24 days for the flow cytometry assay, respectively. In addition, using S2-78 as a probe, the UIM-COVID-19 assay could differentiate COVID-19 patients (convalescents) from healthy people and patients with other diseases, with AUCs ranging from 0.85-0.95. In summary, the UIM-COVID-19 we developed here is a promising ultrasensitive biodetection strategy that has the potential to be applied for both immunological studies and diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.