Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36174058›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Time perspective predicts levels of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-cultural study.

Luigi Micillo, Pier-Alexandre Rioux, Esteban Mendoza, Sebastian L Kübel, Nicola Cellini, Virginie Van Wassenhove, Simon Grondin, Giovanna Mioni

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. An Examination of Multidimensional Time Perspective and Mental Health Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Luigi MicilloDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Pier-Alexandre RiouxÉcole de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Esteban MendozaÉcole de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1524-4273
Sebastian L KübelInstitute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7072-9508
Nicola CelliniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Virginie Van WassenhoveCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, NeuroSpin, CEA, INSERM, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif/Yvette, France.
Simon GrondinÉcole de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Giovanna MioniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-4591
Université Laval · CAUniversity of Padua · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMax Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak and governmental measures to keep the population safe had a great impact on many aspects of society, including well-being. Using data from N = 1281 participants from six countries (Argentina, France, Greece, Italy, Japan, and Turkey), we first explored differences in anxiety, depression (measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS), and time perspectives (Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory; ZTPI), between these countries during the first weeks of the pandemic. We observed that Turkish participants reported the highest levels of anxiety, and Japanese and Greek the lowest. For depression symptoms, the Japanese scored highest and Italians lowest. Next, for each country, we investigated how well the relatively time-stable personality traits of time perspectives, chronotype (reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire; rMEQ), and Big Five personality traits (short Big Five Inventory; BFI) predicted the levels of anxiety and depression (HADS). The regression analyses showed that negative attitudes towards the past predicted the levels of both anxiety and depression in most of the countries we analyzed. Additionally, in many countries, a Past Positive orientation negatively predicted depression whereas the Present Fatalistic subscale predicted anxiety and depression. The chronotype did not contribute additionally to the models. The Big Five traits (and particularly neuroticism) showed substantial incremental explanatory power for anxiety in some countries but did not consistently predict anxiety levels. For depression, the additional variance accounted for by including the BFI as predictors was rather small. Importantly, the ZTPI subscales were retained as significant predictors in the model still when the BFI and rMEQ were considered as potential predictors. Our results yield evidence that the ZTPI time perspectives are valuable predictors for anxiety and depression levels during the first period of the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyCross-Cultural ComparisonDepressionDisease OutbreaksHumans

Identifiers

PMID36174058
PMCPMC9521906
OpenAlexW4297983678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.