ArticlePloS one2022
Predictors for development of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in cancer patients as determined by ordered logistic regression analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concomitant Use of DPP-4 Inhibitors May Prevent the Development of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Proton pump inhibitor concomitant use to prevent oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy: Clinical retrospective cohort study.Pharmacotherapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOxaliplatin causes acute cold-induced neurotoxicity and chronic cumulative neuropathy, which can require dose modification and impacts quality of life. However, effective strategies for managing oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) among affected patients remain elusive.
objectiveThis retrospective study aimed to identify predictors for the development of OIPN.
methodsParticipants comprised 322 cancer patients at our hospital who were receiving oxaliplatin between January 2017 and March 2021. For the regression analysis of factors associated with OIPN, variables were manually extracted from medical charts. The severity of OIPN was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for the development of OIPN. Optimal cut-off thresholds were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Values of P <0.05 (2-tailed) were considered significant.
resultsSignificant risk factors identified included higher body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.12; P = 0.043), female sex (OR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.06-2.61; P = 0.026) and higher total dosage (OR = 2.39, 95%CI = 1.67-3.42; P = < 0.0001).
conclusionHigh BMI, female sex and high total dosage were identified as significant predictors for the development of OIPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.